A jury found defendant guilty of attempted assault of a public safety officer, ORS 161.405 and ORS 163.208, and resisting arrest, ORS 162.315, arising out of a fracas when a Burns police officer arrested him for violating a restraining order. On appeal, defendant raises two assignments of error that challenge the trial courts instructions to the jury. We reject his first assignment of error without discussion. Defendants second assignment of error is foreclosed by our recent decision in State v. Prophet, 318 Or. App. 330, ––– P.3d –––– (2022) (concluding that the trial court did not err in refusing to give the defendants proposed instruction because ORS 162.315 does not require that a defendant intentionally create a substantial risk of harm).
Affirmed.
PER CURIAM