LAW.coLAW.co

IN RE: Anthony Michael PASTEL (2022)

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.2022-03-03No. PM–48–22

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON MOTION

Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court in 2014 and most recently served as a Greene County Assistant Public Defender.  In January 2022, respondent pleaded guilty to the class D violent felony of assault in the second degree (see Penal Law § 120.05[1];  see also Penal Law § 70.02[1][c]) upon his admission to repeatedly punching his then-girlfriend with a closed fist, fracturing her skull and causing a brain bleed and resulting brain damage.  The Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department (hereinafter AGC) now moves for an order striking respondents name from the roll of attorneys as a consequence of his guilty plea (see Judiciary Law § 90[4][a];  Rules for Attorney Disciplinary Matters [22 NYCRR] § 1240.12[a]).  Respondent does not oppose the motion.

The conviction of any attorney of a New York felony results in that attorneys automatic disbarment by operation of law (see Judiciary Law § 90[4][a], [e]) and, for purposes of this proceeding, respondents plea of guilty serves as the functional equivalent of a conviction (see Matter of Zwijacz, 201 A.D.3d 1200, 1200, 156 N.Y.S.3d 926, 927 [2022];  Matter of Tendler, 131 A.D.3d 1301, 1302, 16 N.Y.S.3d 185 [2015]).  Consequently, the only task before us is the “mere formality” of confirming respondents disbarred status (Matter of Percoco, 171 A.D.3d 1450, 1452, 99 N.Y.S.3d 130 [2019];  accord Matter of Zwijacz, 156 N.Y.S.3d at 927, 156 N.Y.S.3d 926).  AGCs motion is therefore granted, respondents disbarment is confirmed and his name is hereby stricken from the roll of attorneys nunc pro tunc to the date of his guilty plea (see Matter of Tendler, 131 A.D.3d at 1302, 16 N.Y.S.3d 185).

ORDERED that the motion of the Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department is granted;  and it is further

ORDERED that respondents name is hereby stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law of the State of New York, effective nunc pro tunc to January 19, 2022;  and it is further

ORDERED that respondent is commanded to desist and refrain from the practice of law in any form in the State of New York, either as principal or as agent, clerk or employee of another;  and respondent is hereby forbidden to appear as an attorney or counselor-at-law before any court, judge, justice, board, commission or other public authority, or to give to another an opinion as to the law or its application, or any advice in relation thereto, or to hold himself out in any way as an attorney and counselor-at-law in this State;  and it is further

ORDERED that respondent shall comply with the provisions of the Rules for Attorney Disciplinary Matters regulating the conduct of disbarred attorneys and shall duly certify to the same in his affidavit of compliance (see Rules for Attorney Disciplinary Matters [22 NYCRR] § 1240.15).

Per Curiam.

Garry, P.J., Aarons, Reynolds Fitzgerald, Colangelo and McShan, JJ, concur.