Petitioners motion for attorneys’ fees is hereby denied.
While I maintain my dissent to the majoritys holding that in order to prove fraudulent concealment, an Engle
1
progeny plaintiff must prove reliance on a specific statement made by an Engle defendant, because Prentice is not the prevailing party in this case, I agree that she is not entitled to appellate attorneys’ fees pursuant to sections 59.46 and 768.79, Florida Statutes (2016). A True Copy
Test:
John A. Tomasino
Clerk, Supreme Court
FOOTNOTES
1
. Engle v. Liggett Group, Inc., 945 So. 2d 1246 (Fla. 2006).
CANADY, C.J., and POLSTON, LABARGA, LAWSON, MUÑIZ,
COURIEL, and GROSSHANS, JJ., concur.
LABARGA, J., concurs with an opinion.