Dismissed. See Fla. Agric. & Mech. Univ., Bd. of Trs. v. United Fac. of Fla., 301 So. 3d 1030, 1031-32 (Fla. 1st DCA 2019); Cordero v. Washington Mut. Bank, 241 So. 3d 967, 968 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018). DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA
SECOND DISTRICT
CATHERINE ELIZABETH CZYZ; THE CZYZ LAW FIRM, P.A.; and THE CZYZ LAW FIRM, PLLC, Appellants,
v.
ERIN BETH NEITZELT, Appellee.
No. 2D22-63
December 16, 2022
BY ORDER OF THE COURT:
IT IS ORDERED that the mandate is withdrawn. Appellant Catherine Elizabeth Czyzs motion for clarification filed December 13, 2022, is denied. On the courts own motion, the opinion issued November 16, 2022, is withdrawn and the attached opinion is substituted in its place. No further motions for rehearing will be entertained and the clerk is directed to issue the mandate contemporaneously.
I HEREBY CERTIFY THE FOREGOING IS A TRUE COPY OF THE ORIGINAL COURT ORDER.
MARY ELIZABETH KUENZEL, CLERK
PER CURIAM.
KELLY, ATKINSON, and LABRIT, JJ., Concur.