In this non-final appeal arising from a divorce case, the wife appeals the denial of her motion to disqualify husbands counsel. In the order under review, the trial court found:
2. The Renewed Motion and the argument and evidence presented at the hearing were unprofessional and unfair. The motion and the argument consisted of unsustained and unsupported ad hominem attacks against Husbands counsel premised on differing interpretations of statute and case law. 3. There was a complete and total failure of proof of any of the allegations or claims set forth therein. The motion to disqualify was completely groundless and the allegations were unfounded.
Having carefully reviewed the briefs and record, we find no error in the trial courts findings or in its order denying the motion.
Affirmed.
PER CURIAM.