Appellant Elizabeth Maya appeals two orders denying her objection to a foreclosure sale. The property at issue was the subject of two prior appeals to this Court. See Maya v. Deutsche Bank Natl Tr. Co., 309 So. 3d 256 (Fla. 3d DCA 2020); Maya v. Deutsche Bank Natl Tr. Co., 264 So. 3d 1076 (Fla. 3d DCA 2019).
Upon our review of the record, we find Appellant has failed to meet her burden to overcome the presumption of correctness of the trial courts order. See Zarate v. Deutsche Bank Nat. Tr. Co. as Tr., 81 So. 3d 556, 557 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012) (“An appellant has the burden to present a record that will overcome the presumption of the correctness of the trial courts findings.”); Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979) (affirming where record of appellant inadequate to demonstrate reversible error).
Affirmed.
PER CURIAM.