Writ application granted. See per curiam.
Hughes, J., dissents and assigns reasons.
Griffin, J., dissents for reasons assigned by Justice Hughes.
11/08/22
SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA
No. 2022-CC-01275
SOULEYA DAOTEUANG, ET AL.
VS.
DR. MICHAEL J. COTUGNO, M.D., ET AL.
On Supervisory Writ to the 16th Judicial District Court, Parish of Iberia
PER CURIAM
Granted. As a result of plaintiffs failure to serve Dr. Cotugno during the abandonment period, any actions taken with regard to other defendants do not interrupt abandonment as to him. Williams v. Montgomery, 2020-01120 (La. 5/13/21), 320 So.3d 1036, 1044. Accordingly, the district courts judgment denying Dr. Cotugnos motion to dismiss on grounds of abandonment is reversed, and plaintiffs January 25, 2016 suit against Dr. Cotugno is dismissed without prejudice. I respectfully dissent from the majoritys conclusion, but nonetheless note that if Dr. Cotugno is solidarily liable with the other defendants prescription would be interrupted.