Affirmed. See Ace Funding Source, LLC v. A1 Transp. Network, Inc., 314 So. 3d 726, 727 (Fla. 3d DCA 2021) (reversing denial of motion to vacate clerks default and default final judgment where prior to default “attorneys from both sides discussed defendants representation by counsel and its intent to defend.”); Contreras v. Stambul, LLC, 306 So. 3d 1143, 1145 (Fla. 3d DCA 2020) (reversing a denial of a motion to vacate a clerks default and explaining that “[f]or purposes of construing the right to enter a default under rule 1.500(a), the term ‘paper’ is construed liberally and includes any written communication that informs the plaintiff of the defendants intent to contest the claim.”) (quoting Becker v. Re/Max Horizons Realty, Inc., 819 So. 2d 887, 890 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002)); Gables Club Marina, LLC v. Gables Condo. & Club Assn, Inc., 948 So. 2d 21, 24 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006) (“[A] reasonable misunderstanding between attorneys regarding settlement negotiations does constitute excusable neglect sufficient to vacate a default and that a trial court abuses its discretion by failing to vacate a default entered in such a case.”); Wofford v. Wofford, 20 So. 3d 470, 473 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009) (“A trial courts ruling is presumed correct, and where no transcript is provided, the appellate court cannot determine whether the evidence supports the trial courts rulings or the court misconceived the law.”).
PER CURIAM.