LAW.coLAW.co

STATE OF LOUISIANA v. BRIAN RAINS (2023)

Supreme Court of Louisiana.2023-10-17No. No. 2023-KH-00555

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

Writ application denied. See per curiam.

WJC

JLW

JDH

SJC

JTG

JBM

PDG

Supreme Court of Louisiana October 17, 2023

10/17/23

SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA

No. 2023-KH-00555

STATE OF LOUISIANA

VS.

BRIAN RAINS

On Supervisory Writ to the 11th Judicial District Court, Parish of Sabine

PER CURIAM:

Denied. By pleading guilty unconditionally, applicant waived all nonjurisdictional defects in the proceedings leading to his conviction. State v. Crosby, 338 So.2d 584, 586 (La. 1976). Applicant fails to satisfy his post-conviction burden of proof of showing the plea was unknowingly or unintelligently made. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.2.

Applicant has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, see 28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a second or successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Applicants claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, applicant has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.