LAW.coLAW.co

JAMES SELF WILMA SELF v. BPX OPERATING COMPANY (2023)

Supreme Court of Louisiana.2023-12-05No. No. 2023-CQ-01242

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

Certification granted. See briefing notice.

JDH

JLW

SJC

JTG

WJC

JBM

PDG

Supreme Court of Louisiana December 05, 2023

12/05/23

Supreme Court

STATE OF LOUISIANA

New Orleans

CHIEF JUSTICE JOHN L WEIMER Sixth District

JUSTICES

WILLIAM J. CRAIN First District

SCOTT J. CRICHTON Second District

JAMES T. GENOVESE Third District

JAY B, MCCALLUM Fourth District

JEFFERSON D. HUGHES III Fifth District

PIPER D. GRIFFIN Seventh District

December 05, 2023

VERONICA O. KOCLANES CLERK OF COURT

400 Royal St., Suite 4200

NEW ORLEANS, LA 70130-8102

TELEPHONE (504) 310-2300

HOME PAGE http://www.lasc.org

2023-CQ-01242

JAMES SELF; WILMA SELF

VS.

BPX OPERATING COMPANY

FOR BRIEFING PURPOSES CERTIFICATION GRANTED: December 5, 2023

MEMORANDUM TO COUNSEL IN CAPTIONED CASE:

Please be advised that the above-captioned matter will be set for oral argument on this Courts next available docket. A copy of the official docket with the specific date and time of oral argument will be mailed out.

Please note Section 6 of Rule XII of the Rules of this Court provides that appellant or moving party in the certifying court must file its brief on or before January 4, 2024 and appellee or responding party in the certifying court on or before February 5, 2024.

Oral argument will be waived if brief is untimely filed. Briefs submitted on legal sized paper should be fastened at the top. All briefs should be backed with the customary “Blueback” or other flexible material. In criminal proceedings, the court directs that counsel must file a brief. Failure to do so may subject counsel to a penalty of contempt of Court.

It is further provided in Rule VII, Section 9 that briefs sent through the mail shall be deemed timely filed if mailed on or before the due date. If the brief is received by mail on the first legal day following the expiration of the delay, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that it was timely filed. In all cases where the presumption does not apply, the timeliness of the mailing shall be shown only by an official United States postmark or by official receipt or certificate from the United States Postal Service, or bona fide commercial mail services such as Federal Express or United Parcel Service, made at the time of mailing which indicates the date thereof. Any other date stamp, such as a private commercial mail meter stamp, or label from an Automated Postal Center, shall not be used to establish timeliness. Briefs forwarded by private delivery or courier service shall be deemed timely filed only if received by the clerk on or before the last day of the delay for filing.

Regards,

Ryan Chan Deputy Clerk

RC: RC

ccs: All Counsel

Hon. Lyle W. Cayce

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit: 22-30243