Per Curiam.
[¶1] K.R. appeals from a juvenile court order terminating her parental rights to Y.R. K.R. argues the court erred in finding clear and convincing evidence established Y.R. was a child in need of protection and that the conditions and causes of the need for protection were likely to continue. After reviewing the record, the courts findings are supported by clear and convincing evidence and are not clearly erroneous. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). [¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J.
Lisa Fair McEvers
Jerod E. Tufte
Douglas A. Bahr
Cherie L. Clark, D.J.
Per Curiam.
[¶3] The Honorable Cherie L. Clark, D.J., sitting in place of Crothers, J., disqualified.