ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR A WRIT OF PROHIBITION
This original pro se petition appears to seek a writ of prohibition prohibiting the State from proceeding in its case against petitioner with discovery that he asserts was not timely or adequately submitted.
Problematically, petitioner has not provided this court with exhibits or other documentation that would support his claims for relief. See NRAP 21(a)(4) (providing the petitioner shall submit an appendix containing all documents “essential to understand the matters set forth in the petition”). Therefore, without deciding the merits of the claims raised, we decline to exercise our original jurisdiction in this matter. See NRAP 21(b). We reiterate that “[p]etitioner[ ] carr[ies] the burden of demonstrating that extraordinary relief is warranted.” Pan v. Eighth Jud. Dist. Ct., 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004). Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.
Cadish, C.J.
Stiglich, J.
Herndon, J.