ORDER DENYING PETITION
This original petition for a writ of mandamus challenges a district court order denying a motion to dismiss.
Having considered the parties’ briefing and the record, we are not persuaded that our extraordinary intervention is warranted at this stage in the proceedings. See NRS 34.160; Cote H. v. Eighth Jud. Dist. Ct., 124 Nev. 36, 39, 175 P.3d 906, 908 (2008) (“Because ․ writs of mandamus are extraordinary remedies, we have complete discretion to determine whether to consider them.”). We reiterate that we generally decline to consider petitions for writs of mandamus challenging denials of motions to dismiss. Intl Game Tech., Inc. v. Second Jud. Dist. Ct., 124 Nev. 193, 197, 179 P.3d 556, 558 (2008). We are not convinced that any exceptions to this general rule apply here. See id. at 197-98, 179 P.3d at 559 (describing the exceptions to the general rule). Accordingly, we deny the petition. It is so ORDERED.
Stiglich, J.
Pickering, J.
Parraguirre, J.