ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
This is a pro se appeal from a district court order dismissing in part a petition for a writ of habeas corpus and denying, without prejudice, a motion for appointment of counsel. First Judicial District Court, Carson City; Kristin Luis, Judge.
This courts review of this appeal reveals a jurisdictional defect. Specifically, the appeal appears premature because claims remain pending below. See generally Stale v. Lewis, 124 Nev. 132, 136, 178 P.3d 146, 148 (2008) (explaining that, generally, a judgment must be final before vesting jurisdiction in this court); NRAP 4(b)(5)(B) (providing for entry of a judgment finally resolving postconviction matters). The district court expressly maintained appellants claim regarding loss of credits and contemplated further proceedings on that claim. Appellant may appeal from a final judgment resolving all of his postconviction claims. NRS 34.575. This court is confident that the district court will resolve the outstanding claim in a timely fashion. Additionally, no statute or court rule permits an appeal from an order denying a motion to appoint counsel. Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 352, 792 P.2d 1133, 1135 (1990). Because we lack jurisdiction over this appeal, this appeal is dismissed. In light of this determination, the court takes no action on the motion filed April 3, 2024.
It is so ORDERED.
Stiglich, J.
Pickering, J.
Parraguirre, J.