ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
This is a pro se appeal from a district court order denying motions, a December 19, 2023, order to statistically close case, and several motions. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Danielle K. Pieper, Judge.
Review of the notice of appeal and documents before this court reveals a jurisdictional defect. It does not appear that the district court has entered a final judgment appealable under NRAP 3A(b)(1) because appellants claims against HOA Lawyers Group remain pending in the district court. See Lee v. GNLV Corp., 116 Nev. 424, 426, 996 P.2d 416, 417 (2000) (“[A] final judgment is one that disposes of all the issues presented in the case, and leaves nothing for the future consideration of the court, except for post-judgment issues such as attorneys fees and costs.”). The identified orders do not appear to be appealable pursuant to any other statute or court rule. See Brown v. MHC Stagecoach, LLC, 129 Nev. 343, 301 P.3d 850 (2013) (explaining that this court “may only consider appeals authorized by statute or court rule” and concluding that a form order statistically closing a case is not appealable). And motions filed in the district court are not appealable. Accordingly, this court lacks jurisdiction and ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.
1
Stiglich, J.
Pickering, J.
Parraguirre, J.
FOOTNOTES
1
. If aggrieved, appellant may file a new notice of appeal once the district court enters a written order finally resolving the claims against HOA Lawyers Group.