ANDREW PULLOS v. THE STATE OF NEVADA EMPLOYMENT SECURITY DIVISION KRISTINE NELSON IN HER CAPACITY AS ADMINISTRATOR OF THE EMPLOYMENT SECURITY DIVISION AND THOMAS SUSICH IN HIS CAPACITY AS CHAIRPERSON OF THE EMPLOYMENT SECURITY DVISION BOARD OF REVIEW (2024)

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This is a pro se appeal from a district court order construing appellants complaint as a petition for judicial review and denying the petition. Second Judicial District Court, Washoe County; David A. Hardy, Judge.

Review of the notice of appeal and documents before this court reveals a jurisdictional defect. On December 18, 2023, less than 28 days after service of notice of entry of the challenged order, appellant filed a document titled “Response[.] Excerpts and Conclusions from Plaintiffs Complaint Regarding Judicial Review.” Therein, appellant asserts that his complaint cannot be construed as a petition for judicial review. Although not titled as a motion for reconsideration, we construe this document as a motion for reconsideration that is afforded tolling effect. See NRAP 4(a)(4) (regarding tolling motions); AA Primo Builders LLC v. Washington, 126 Nev. 578, 585, 245 P.3d 1190, 1195 (2010) (describing when a post-judgment motion for reconsideration carries tolling effect). Appellant prematurely filed the notice of appeal in the district court after filing the motion but before entry of a written order resolving the motion. To date, it appears the motion remains pending in the district court.

This court lacks jurisdiction over a premature notice of appeal. NRAP 4(a)(6). Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed. Appellant may file a new notice of appeal once the district court enters a written order finally resolving the December 18, 2023, motion.

It is so ORDERED.

Stiglich, J.

Pickering, J.

Parraguirre, J.