LAW.coLAW.co

IN RE: Steven R. ANDERSON (2024)

Supreme Court of South Carolina.2024-06-05No. Appellate Case Nos. 2024-000936 and 2024-000937

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

ORDER

The Office of Disciplinary Counsel has petitioned the Court to place Respondent on incapacity inactive status pursuant to Rule 28(a)(2) of the Rules for Lawyer Disciplinary Enforcement (RLDE) contained in Rule 413 of the South Carolina Appellate Court Rules (SCACR). The petition also seeks appointment of the Receiver to protect the interests of Respondents clients pursuant to Rule 31, RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR.

IT IS ORDERED that Respondent is hereby placed on incapacity inactive status. Based on the record, the Court finds Respondent is unable to practice law or participate in the disciplinary investigation, and further proceedings under Rule 28(b), RLDE, are unnecessary at this time.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Peyre T. Lumpkin, Esquire, is hereby appointed to assume responsibility for Respondents client files, trust account(s), escrow account(s), operating account(s), and any other law office accounts Respondent may maintain. Mr. Lumpkin shall take action as required by Rule 31, RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR, to protect the interests of Respondents clients. Except as authorized by Rule 31(d)(5), RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR, Mr. Lumpkin may not practice law in any federal, state, or local court, including the entry of an appearance in a court of this State or of the United States. Mr. Lumpkin may make disbursements from and close Respondents trust account(s), escrow account(s), operating account(s), and any other law office accounts Respondent may maintain that are necessary to effectuate this appointment.

This Order, when served on any bank or other financial institution maintaining trust, escrow and/or operating account(s) of Respondent, shall serve as an injunction to prevent Respondent from making withdrawals from the account(s) and shall further serve as notice to the bank or other financial institution that Peyre T. Lumpkin, Esquire, has been duly appointed by this Court.

Finally, this Order, when served on any office of the United States Postal Service, shall serve as notice that Peyre T. Lumpkin, Esquire, has been duly appointed by this Court and has the authority to receive Respondents mail and the authority to direct that Respondents mail be delivered to Mr. Lumpkins office.

Donald W. Beatty, C.J.