Affirmed. See Griffin v. State, 639 So. 2d 966, 968 (Fla. 1994) (“[E]vidence of uncharged crimes which are inseparable from the crime charged, or evidence which is inextricably intertwined with the crime charged, is ․ admissible under section 90.402 [of the Florida Statutes] because ‘it is a relevant and inseparable part of the act which is in issue ․ [I]t is necessary to admit the evidence to adequately describe the deed.’ ”) (quoting Charles W. Ehrhardt, Florida Evidence § 404.17 (1993 ed.)); see also Beckman v. State, 230 So. 3d 77, 84 (Fla. 3d DCA (2017) (“Evidence is inextricably intertwined if the evidence is necessary to (1) ‘adequately describe the deed[ ];’ (2) provide an intelligent account of the crime(s) charged; (3) establish the entire context out of which the charged crime(s) arose; or (4) adequately describe the events leading up to the charged crime(s).”) (quoting Dorsett v. State, 944 So. 2d 1207, 1213 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006) (en banc)).
PER CURIAM.