Affirmed. See Ward v. Waters, 49 Fla. L. Weekly D72, at *2 (Fla. 3d DCA Jan. 3, 2024) (explaining that trial courts possess “substantial discretion in rendering decisions relating to the frequency, timing, duration, and conditions of timesharing” that “must be supported by a finding as to the best interests of the child”) (citing Talarico v. Talarico, 305 So. 3d 601, 603 (Fla. 3d DCA 2020) (explaining substantial discretion); and Davis v. Davis, 245 So. 3d 810, 812 (Fla. 4th DCA 2018) (explaining findings related to the best interests of the child)).
PER CURIAM.