K.R. appeals a restitution order holding her jointly and severally liable with her co-defendants for restitution to a burglary victim. She raises two issues, only one of which was preserved for appellate review. On the preserved point, it was error to award lost-wages restitution to the victim corresponding to the loss of work from an illegal cosmetology practice. See S.L.L. v. State, 381 So. 3d 1276, 1278 (Fla. 1st DCA 2024) (reversing portion of co-defendants restitution order).
Accordingly, we reverse the portion of the trial courts restitution order awarding $3,650 in restitution for lost wages and affirm the order in all other respects.
Ray, J.
B.L. Thomas and Kelsey, JJ., concur.