Affirmed. See Deutsche Bank Tr. Co. Americas as Tr. for Residential Accredit Loans, Inc. v. Harris, 264 So. 3d 186, 192-93 (Fla. 4th DCA 2019) (“On appeal, the Bank correctly argues that it was unnecessary for its witness to testify regarding his knowledge of the third-party vendors mailing practices to establish that the demand letter had been sent․ [O]ur review of the record in this case leads us to conclude that sufficient evidence was presented to preclude an involuntary dismissal at the close of the Banks case-in-chief on the issue of whether a prima facie showing was made that the demand letter was mailed to the borrower prior to the filing of the suit.”).
PER CURIAM.