We affirm the convictions and sentences on all issues raised by the appellant. As to the appellants claim regarding the denial of the motion to disqualify the trial judge, any error was harmless. See Davis v. State, 347 So. 3d 315, 327 n.6 (Fla. 2022) (applying the harmless error standard where error in the denial of a motion for disqualification did not have “a reasonable probability of contributing to [the defendants] conviction”). Affirmed.
Per Curiam.
Warner, Conner and Artau, JJ., concur.