AFFIRMED. See McCain v. Fla. Power Corp., 593 So. 2d 500, 503 (Fla. 1992) (holding that a “requirement of reasonable, general foresight is the core of the duty element” in a negligence action and that “duty exists as a matter of law and is not a factual question for the jury to decide”); see also United States v. Stevens, 994 So. 2d 1062, 1066–67 (Fla. 2008) (reaffirming McCain). Per Curiam.
Osterhaus, C.J., and Bilbrey and Nordby, JJ., concur.