Affirmed. Parkhomchuck v. AIY, Inc., 338 So. 3d 397, 400 (Fla. 3d DCA 2022) (“[I]f the appellants were dissatisfied with the trial courts ruling on their first rule 1.540(b) motion, their remedy was by appeal, not b[y] filing successive motions to vacate containing the same general grounds or even new ones, which could have been raised in the first motion.” (quotation omitted)).
PER CURIAM.