This appeal arises out of the appellants attempt to set aside a foreclosure judgment. After this court dismissed the appellants appeal of the foreclosure judgment based on the notice of appeal not being timely filed, the appellant moved for relief from judgment and/or rehearing, requesting that the trial court vacate the judgment and dismiss the foreclosure based on the appellees purported submission of fraudulent evidence, or, in the alternative, grant rehearing. The appellant appeals from the order denying his motion.
We find no merit to the appellants argument that the trial court erred in denying his motion for relief from judgment, and we affirm on that issue. Further, we dismiss the appeal of the portion of the order denying rehearing of the foreclosure judgment. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.130(a)(4) (providing that “[o]rders disposing of motions for rehearing ․ are not reviewable separately from a review of the final order”).
Affirmed in part, dismissed in part.
Per Curiam.
Damoorgian, Ciklin and Gerber, JJ., concur.