Appellee filed a complaint against several employees of the Florida Department of Corrections, alleging they mishandled his personal property. Appellant Ricky D. Dixon, Secretary of the Florida Department of Corrections, moved to dismiss the complaint, arguing, among other things, that Secretary Dixon was entitled to sovereign immunity pursuant to section 768.28(9)(a), Florida Statutes. The lower court denied the motion to dismiss. This timely appeal followed.
An order denying a motion to dismiss is a non-final order and not typically reviewable on appeal. However, Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130(a)(3)(F)(ii) allows appeals of non-final orders that deny a motion that asserts entitlement to immunity under section 768.28(9). This Court can therefore review the denial of the sovereign immunity claim.
Appellees complaint alleges that certain Department of Corrections employees destroyed his boxes of legal documents. He alleges that the employees’ actions were retaliatory and intentionally done in bad faith with a malicious purpose. The state is immune from tort claims that are based on an employee acting in bad faith or with a malicious purpose. So, as pled, Secretary Dixon, in his official capacity as the head of the Department of Corrections, is immune.
Reversed.
Per Curiam.
Ray, Bilbrey, and Long, JJ., concur.