In this Anders
*
appeal, we affirm the revocation of probation and the judgment and sentence imposed upon Veltman. Because the record does not include a written revocation order that identifies the terms and conditions of probation violated, the trial court on remand is instructed to enter a written revocation order that specifies the terms and conditions of probation that Veltman was found to have violated as orally pronounced. See Font v. State, 299 So. 3d 627, 627 (Fla. 5th DCA 2020); Burnem v. State, 279 So. 3d 1275, 1275−76 (Fla. 5th DCA 2019). Affirmed and Remanded with instructions.
FOOTNOTES
FOOTNOTE
. Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).
Per Curiam.
Makar, Wallis, and Eisnaugle, JJ., concur.