Appellant, United Automobile Insurance Company, appeals a judgment in favor of a medical provider, ISO-Diagnostics Testing, Inc. (“ISO”), for PIP benefits. The trial court ruled in ISOs favor on its claim that, pursuant to the policy, United owed additional PIP payments because United had improperly paid ISO based on the 2017 Medicare Schedule of Payments, rather than the higher 2018 schedule. We have recently decided this exact issue involving a United PIP policy with the similar relevant policy language against the same provider in United Automobile Insurance Co. vs. ISO-Diagnostics Testing, Inc., a/a/o Suryma Pineiro Morales, No. 4D2022-1735, --- So. 3d ---, 2024 WL 103664 (Fla. 4th DCA Jan. 10, 2024). We reversed the judgment for ISO and held that “under the plain meaning of the policy and the statute, whether pre- or post-amendment [of the statute], the definition of a ‘year’ meant a service year governing the payout at issue.” Id. at *2.
Based upon our prior opinion, we also reverse the final judgment for ISO in this case and remand for entry of judgment for United.
Reversed.
Per Curiam.
Warner, Ciklin and Kuntz, JJ., concur.