LAW.coLAW.co

Dror Levy, etc., et al., Appellants, v. Eliezer Tabib, etc., et al., Appellees. (2024)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.2024-01-03No. No. 3D22-1759

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

Affirmed. See Sher v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., 848 So. 2d 1246, 1249 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003) (“The trial courts ruling concerning an award of fees under [section 772.11, Florida Statutes] is subject to an abuse of discretion standard of review and shall not be reversed absent competent record support.”); Ciaramello v. DAmbra, 613 So. 2d 1324, 1325 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991) (“[S]ection 772.11 provides a civil remedy for theft. It entitles a defendant to recover reasonable attorneys fees and court costs in the trial and appellate courts ‘upon a finding that the claimant raised a claim which was without substantial fact or legal support.’ ” (quoting § 772.11(1), Fla. Stat.)); Nodal v. Infinity Auto Ins. Co., 50 So. 3d 721, 724 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010) (reversing a trial courts denial of attorneys fees and costs under section 772.11 only where “no record evidence [supported] the factual or legal basis for [the] civil theft claim”); Alex Hofrichter, P.A. v. Zuckerman & Venditti, P.A., 710 So. 2d 127, 129 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998) (finding “an action for conversion and civil theft will lie where there is a claim that the defendant has misappropriated or embezzled [funds]”) (footnote omitted).

PER CURIAM.