Affirmed. See Lazcar Intl, Inc. v. Caraballo, 957 So. 2d 1191, 1192–93 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007) (noting that evidence supporting due diligence “must be sworn” and explaining that “[a]bsent competent substantial evidence of some exceptional circumstance explaining the delay” a party does not show due diligence as a matter of law where a sworn motion to vacate was filed six weeks after discovery of the default); see also Elliott v. Aurora Loan Servs., LLC, 31 So. 3d 304, 306 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010) (setting forth abuse of discretion standard).
PER CURIAM.