LAW.coLAW.co

IN RE: MARK EL-AMM (2024)

Supreme Court of Louisiana.2024-06-25No. No. 2024-B-00656

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

Joint petition for consent discipline accepted. See per curiam.

JLW

JDH

WJC

PDG

Supreme Court of Louisiana June 25, 2024

06/25/24

SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA

NO. 2024-B-0656

IN RE: MARK EL-AMM

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDING

PER CURIAM

The Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) commenced an investigation into allegations that respondent mismanaged his client trust account. Prior to the filing of formal charges, respondent and the ODC submitted a joint petition for consent discipline. Having reviewed the petition,

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that Mark El-Amm, Louisiana Bar Roll number 34171, be suspended from the practice of law for a period of six months. This suspension shall be deferred in its entirety, subject to a one-year period of supervised probation governed by the conditions set forth in the petition for consent discipline. The probationary period shall commence from the date respondent, the probation monitor, and the ODC execute a formal probation plan. Any failure of respondent to comply with the conditions of probation, or any misconduct during the probationary period, may be grounds for making the deferred suspension executory, or imposing additional discipline, as appropriate. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this courts judgment until paid.

Genovese, J., dissents and would reject the proposed joint petition as too lenient.