LAW.coLAW.co

POLICE JURY OF CALCASIEU PARISH v. INDIAN HARBOR INSURANCE CO ET AL (2024)

Supreme Court of Louisiana.2024-06-19No. No. 2024-CQ-00449

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

Certification granted. See briefing notice.

SJC

JLW

JDH

JTG

WJC

JBM

PDG

Supreme Court of Louisiana June 19, 2024

Supreme Court

STATE OF LOUISIANA

New Orleans

Sixth District

First District

Second District

Third District

Fourth District

Fifth District

Seventh District

CHIEF JUSTICE JOHN L. WEIMER

JUSTICES

WILLIAM J. CRAIN

SCOTT J. CRICHTON

JAMES T. GENOVESE

JAY B. MCCALLUM

JEFFERSON HUGHES

PIPER D. GRIFFIN

VERONICA O. KOCLANES CLERK OF COURT

400 Royal St., Suite 4200 NEW ORLEANS, LA 70130-8102

TELEPHONE (504) 310-2300 HOME PAGE http://www.lasc.org

June 19, 2024

2024-CQ-00449 POLICE JURY OF CALCASIEU PARISH VS. INDIAN HARBOR INSURANCE CO., ET AL.

FOR BRIEFING PURPOSES CERTIFICATION GRANTED: June 19, 2024.

MEMORANDUM TO COUNSEL IN CAPTIONED CASE:

Please be advised that the above-captioned matter will be set for oral argument on this Courts next available docket. A copy of the official docket with the specific date and time of oral argument will be mailed out.

Please note Section 6 of Rule XII of the Rules of this Court provides that appellant or moving party in the certifying court must file its brief on or before July 19, 2024 and appellee or responding party in the certifying court on or before August 19, 2024.

Oral argument will be waived if brief is untimely filed. Briefs submitted on legal sized paper should be fastened at the top. All briefs should be backed with the customary “Blueback” or other flexible material. In criminal proceedings, the court directs that counsel must file a brief. Failure to do so may subject counsel to a penalty of contempt of Court.

It is further provided in Rule VII, Section 9 that briefs sent through the mail shall be deemed timely filed if mailed on or before the due date. If the brief is received by mail on the first legal day following the expiration of the delay, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that it was timely filed. In all cases where the presumption does not apply, the timeliness of the mailing shall be shown only by an official United States postmark or by official receipt or certificate from the United States Postal Service, or bona fide commercial mail services such as Federal Express or United Parcel Service, made at the time of mailing which indicates the date thereof. Any other date stamp, such as a private commercial mail meter stamp, or label from an Automated Postal Center, shall not be used to establish timeliness. Briefs forwarded by private delivery or courier service shall be deemed timely filed only if received by the clerk on or before the last day of the delay for filing.

Regards,

Ryan Chan Deputy Clerk

RC: RC

ccs: All Counsel

Hon. James D. Cain, Jr.

Tony R. Moore

United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana Lake Charles Division: 2:24-CV-00342