In light of the victims eyewitness testimony that he spent time socializing with the defendant before the defendant shot him, we find that the victims brothers testimony identifying the defendants truck, even if it were based on implied hearsay rather than a change in testimony (which we do not decide), was at best, “harmless beyond a reasonable doubt.” Capehart v. State, 583 So. 2d 1009, 1013 (Fla. 1991) (citing State v. DiGuilio, 491 So. 2d 1129 (Fla. 1986)).
Affirmed.
PER CURIAM.