ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS
This original pro se petition for a writ of mandamus seeks to compel the district court to set petitioners postconviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus for hearing.
Having reviewed the petition, we are not persuaded that our extraordinary and discretionary intervention is warranted. See NRS 34.170; Pan v. Eighth Jud. Dist. Ct., 120 Nev. 222, 224, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 841, 844 (2004) (explaining that writ relief is proper only when there is no plain, speedy, and adequate remedy at law and the petitioner bears the burden of demonstrating that writ relief is warranted). The district court controls how its cases are docketed, and we are confident that the district court will resolve all pending matters as expeditiously as its calendar permits. Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.
Cadish, C.J.
Stiglich, J.
Herndon, J.