ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
This is a pro se appeal purporting to appeal from a district court order denying appellants “motion for ESDs Answering Brief” in a workers compensation matter.
1
Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Adriana Escobar, Judge.
Review of the notice of appeal and other documents before this court reveals a jurisdictional defect. Appellant fails to identify an appealable order. See NRAP 3(c)(1) (setting forth the requisite contents of the notice of appeal); NRAP 3A(b) (specifying appealable determinations); Brown v. MHC Stagecoach, LLC, 129 Nev. 343, 345, 301 P.3d 850, 851 (2013) (explaining that this court “may only consider appeals authorized by statute or rule”); Moran v. Bonneville Square Assocs., 117 Nev. 525, 527, 25 P.3d 898, 899 (2001) (“[T]he burden rests squarely upon the shoulders of a party seeking to invoke our jurisdiction to establish, to our satisfaction, that this court does in fact have jurisdiction.”). Accordingly, this court ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.
2
Herndon, J.
Lee, J.
Bell, J.
FOOTNOTES
1
. The clerk of this court is directed to revise the caption in this appeal to conform to the caption on this order.
2
. Given this order, this court takes no action in regard to appellants motions filed on January 9 and 16, 2024.