LAW.coLAW.co

PEOPLE v. SMITH (2024)

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.2024-06-26No. 2020–04064

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (William M. Harrington, J.), rendered May 3, 2019, as amended May 7, 2019, convicting him of attempted sexual abuse in the first degree, forcible touching, and public lewdness, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment, as amended, is affirmed.

The defendants contention that the evidence was legally insufficient to establish, beyond a reasonable doubt, his guilt of attempted sexual abuse in the first degree is unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05[2];  People v. Hawkins, 11 N.Y.3d 484, 492, 872 N.Y.S.2d 395, 900 N.E.2d 946).  In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v. Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620, 621, 467 N.Y.S.2d 349, 454 N.E.2d 932), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendants guilt of that crime beyond a reasonable doubt.  Moreover, in fulfilling our responsibility to conduct an independent review of the weight of the evidence (see CPL 470.15[5];  People v. Danielson, 9 N.Y.3d 342, 849 N.Y.S.2d 480, 880 N.E.2d 1), we nevertheless accord great deference to the jurys opportunity to view the witnesses, hear the testimony, and observe demeanor (see People v. Mateo, 2 N.Y.3d 383, 410, 779 N.Y.S.2d 399, 811 N.E.2d 1053;  People v. Bleakley, 69 N.Y.2d 490, 495, 515 N.Y.S.2d 761, 508 N.E.2d 672).  Upon reviewing the record here, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt as to that crime was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v. Romero, 7 N.Y.3d 633, 826 N.Y.S.2d 163, 859 N.E.2d 902).

The defendants remaining contention is without merit.

BRATHWAITE NELSON, J.P., CHAMBERS, WAN and LANDICINO, JJ., concur.