Nathan T. Griffin appeals an order revoking his probation and resulting sentence. We affirm in all respects without further discussion. However, we remand for correction of a scriveners error in the revocation order, which incorrectly states that Griffin admitted to violating condition 5 of his probation. The record reflects that the court held a hearing on the violation, that Griffin contested the fact that he violated probation, and that the court found a willful and substantial violation. See Caldwell v. State, 72 So. 3d 779, 779–80 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011).
AFFIRMED; REMANDED to correct scriveners error.
Per Curiam
Makar, Harris and Soud, JJ., concur.