LAW.coLAW.co

IN RE: ATTORNEYS IN VIOLATION OF JUDICIARY LAW § 468–A. (2024)

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.2024-06-20No. PM–122–24

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

DECISION AND ORDER ON MOTION

Motion by respondent for an order reinstating her to the practice of law following her suspension by October 2021 order of this Court (Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a, 198 A.D.3d 1068, 1087, 154 N.Y.S.3d 677 [3d Dept. 2021]; see Rules for Atty Disciplinary Matters [22 NYCRR] § 1240.16; Rules of App Div, 3d Dept [22 NYCRR] § 806.16).

Upon reading respondents affidavit with exhibits sworn to April 15, 2024, and the May 20, 2024 correspondence from the Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, and having determined, by clear and convincing evidence, that (1) respondent has satisfied the requirements of Rules of the Appellate Division, Third Department (22 NYCRR) § 806.16 (c) (5); (2) respondent has complied with the order of suspension and the rules of this Court, (3) respondent has the requisite character and fitness to practice law, and (4) it would be in the public interest to reinstate respondent to the practice of law (see Rules for Atty Disciplinary Matters [22 NYCRR] § 1240.16 [a]), it is

ORDERED that respondents motion for reinstatement is granted; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law, effective immediately.

Garry, P.J., Egan Jr., Clark, Aarons and Powers, JJ., concur.