Per Curiam.
[¶1] Arnold Nudah Rennie appeals from a district court order denying his petition for postconviction relief. Rennie argues the court erred in denying his petition because he received ineffective assistance of trial counsel. After a hearing, at which Rennies trial counsel testified, the court found Rennie failed to establish his trial counsels representation fell below an objective standard of reasonableness and there was a reasonable probability that, but for the alleged errors of counsel, the outcome of trial would have been different. [¶2] We conclude the district courts findings that Rennie failed to establish his trial counsels performance fell below an objective standard of reasonableness and there was no prejudice to Rennie regarding the second prong of the Strickland test are not clearly erroneous. See Benter v. State, 2023 ND 215, ¶ 2, 997 N.W.2d 864. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).
[¶3] Jon J. Jensen, C.J.
Daniel J. Crothers
Lisa Fair McEvers
Jerod E. Tufte
Douglas A. Bahr
Per Curiam.