LAW.coLAW.co

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, RESPONDENT, v. JAMES CARROLL, APPELLANT

New Jersey Supreme Court1943-09-24
130 N.J.L. 559

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Per side in the Supreme Court. For affirmance- — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Parker, Case, Donges, Porter, Dear, Wells, Rafferty, Hague, Thompson, JJ. 11. For reversal — None.