John Edward KUPLEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael S. HAMDEN; Franklin E. Freeman, Jr.; Theodis Beck; Charles Bullock; Finesse G. Couch; Gerotha R. Spain; Martin McDade; G.J. Haynes; Michael F. Easley; William McBlief; Dana Davis; James B. Hunt, Jr.; Sidney S. Eagles, Jr., Judge; K. Edward Green; John B. Lewis, Jr., Judge; James A. Wynn, Jr.; John C. Martin; Joseph R. John, Sr., Judge; Ralph A. Walker; Linda M. McGee, Trustee; Patricia Timmons Goodson; Clarence E. Horton, Jr.; Robert C. Hunter; Robert H. Edmunds, Jr.; Donald L. Smith; Jack Cozart; Henry E. Frye, Justice; Sarah Parker, Justice; I. Beverly Lake, Justice; Robert Orr; Mark D. Martin; George L. Wainwright, Jr.; John Webb, Justice; Willis P. Whichard, Justice; Burley Mitchell; Gerald Arnold, Defendants-Appellees

United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit2001-01-24No. No. 00-6871

2 F. App'x 326

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion · public domain

majority opinion

PER CURIAM.

John Edward Kuplen appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.2000) complaint and motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Kuplen v. Ham-den, No. CA-00-48-5-H (E.D.N.C. Apr. 5 & May 16, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.