PER CURIAM.
Gerald David Davage appeals the district court’s order denying his motions to recuse and to reopen a prior action. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order and find no abuse of discretion in the district court’s denial of the motion to recuse. United States v. Gordon, 61 F.3d 263, 267-68 (4th Cir.1995) (providing standard). Nor do we find any error in the district court’s denial of Davage’s motion to reopen. Accordingly, we deny Davage’s motion for a certificate of appeal-ability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.