GEORGE H. MILLER, TRADING AS, ETC., APPELLANT, v. WINSTON PAUL ET AL., RESPONDENTS

Per. Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Chief Justice Brogan in the Supreme Court. For affirmance — The Chancellor, Case, Bodine, Donges, Hehbr, Pbrskie, Colie, Dear, Wells, Rapeerty, Hague, Thompson, Dill, JJ. 13. For reversal — None.