LAW.coLAW.co

THOMAS MORAN, APPELLANT, v. MOORE-McCORMACK LINES, RESPONDENT

New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals1944-09-14
132 N.J.L. 171

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be .affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Chief Justice Brogan in the Supreme Court. For affirmance■ — The Chancellor, Parker, Case, Donges, Perskie, Porter, Dear, Wells, Hague, Thompson, JJ. 10. For reversal — Hbher, Raeeertt, Dill, JJ. 3.