LAW.coLAW.co

Raymond I. COOK; Deborah Cook, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CHELAN COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT; Chelan County; Chelan County Prosecutors Office; Chelan County Jail; Kitsap County Sheriffs Department; Kitsap County WA; County Prosecutors Office; John Does, I and II; Gwinnett County; Gwinnett County Sheriffs Department; Ron Dobbins, Lt.; Howland, Deputy; Gwinnett County District Atty, Defendants, and Sherry Ellison, Asst. District Attorney, Gwinnett County; et al., Defendants-Appellees

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit2001-05-25No. No. 99-36045; D.C. No. CV-95-05686-JKA
10 F. App'x 527

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

MEMORANDUM

Raymond and Deborah Cook, husband and wife, appeal pro se the district court’s refusal to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over their state law claims. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. A court’s refusal to exercise supplemental jurisdiction is reviewed for abuse of discretion. San Pedro Hotel Co. v. City of Los Angeles, 159 F.3d 470, 478 (9th Cir.1998) (citation omitted).

The district court did not abuse its discretion by declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the Cooks’ state law claims after it properly dismissed all claims over which it had original jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(3); Executive Software N. Am., Inc. v. United States Dist. Court, 24 F.3d 1545, 1555-56 (9th Cir.1994).

Appellants’ remaining contentions are not persuasive.

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.