PER CURIAM.
Gerald R. Byrd appeals the district court’s order of summary judgment. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Byrd v. BP Amoco Polymers, No. CA-99-3649-6-13AK (D.S.C. Jan. 19, 2001). We deny Byrd’s motion for production of documents and motion to compel delivery of documents. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.