LAW.coLAW.co

Charles H. Blohm, respondent, v. John M. Hannan et al., appellants

New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals1914-05-08
83 N.J. Eq. 347

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Pee Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Lewis. For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Kalisoh, Bogert, Hepreni-ieimer — 6.

For reversal — Bergen, Minturn, Vredenburgh, White — 4.