LAW.coLAW.co

Maggie Watson et al., respondents, v. David Magill, appellant

New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals1916-03-06
85 N.J. Eq. 592

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion hied in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Learning. For affirmance—Swayzb, Trenchakd, Bergen, Kalisch^ Black, White, Teehune, Williams—8.

For reversal—Ti-ie Chief-Justice, Garrison, Parker, Min-turn, Vredenburgi-i, Heppenheimer, Taylor—7.