LAW.coLAW.co

MARY STELIGA ET AL., RESPONDENTS, v. THE METROPOLITAN CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK, APPELLANT

New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals1935-01-10
114 N.J.L. 156

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Lloyd in the Supreme Court. For affirmance — The Chancelloe, Chief Justice, Case, Bodine, Donges, Hehee, Yah Buskiek, Kays, Hetfield, Deae, Wells, JJ. 11. For reversal — None.