PER CURIAM.
Raymond Outler appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant Outler’s motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis and affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Outlet v. Conley, No. CA-99-213 (S.D.W.Va. Nov. 7, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.